পদ্ধতির তুলনা করুন
নির্বাচিত পদ্ধতিগুলো পাশাপাশি পর্যালোচনা করুন; যে সারিগুলোয় পার্থক্য আছে সেগুলো চিহ্নিত করা হয়।
| Robust Nomological Validity× | বৈষম্যমূলক বৈধতা (Discriminant Validity)× | |
|---|---|---|
| ক্ষেত্র | মনোমিতি | মনোমিতি |
| পরিবার | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| উদ্ভবের বছর≠ | 1955 | 1959 |
| প্রবর্তক≠ | Cronbach & Meehl (seminal framework); later extended by Shadish, Cook, and Campbell | Donald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske |
| ধরন≠ | Validity assessment / construct validation | Validity evidence / psychometric evaluation |
| মৌলিক উৎস≠ | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| অপর নাম | nomological network validity, robust validity testing, nomological validity, RNV | discriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity |
| সম্পর্কিত | 5 | 5 |
| সারসংক্ষেপ≠ | Robust nomological validity evaluates whether a psychological construct relates to theoretically expected variables in the predicted directions, using statistically robust estimation methods that remain trustworthy when distributional assumptions are violated. It tests the construct's place within its nomological network — the web of theoretical relationships that define its meaning. | Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling. |
| ScholarGateডেটাসেট ↗ |
|
|