ScholarGate
Асистент
Process / pipelineSociology of scientific knowledge

Boundary-Work Analysis

Boundary-work analysis studies how the line between science and non-science is drawn, defended, and contested—not by philosophers laying down timeless criteria, but by actors doing rhetorical work to secure authority, resources, and credibility. Introduced by Thomas Gieryn in 1983 and elaborated in his 1999 book Cultural Boundaries of Science, the approach treats demarcation as a practical, strategic, and historically variable accomplishment. The method examines the discourse of demarcation episodes to reveal the strategies—expansion, expulsion, and protection of autonomy—through which the cultural map of science is redrawn whenever its credibility is on the line.

Отворете в MethodMindСкороПриложете, сравнете, получете насоки
Инструменти и ресурси
Изтегляне на слайдове
Учене и проучване
ВидеоСкоро

Прочетете целия метод

Само за членове

Влезте с безплатен профил, за да прочетете този раздел.

Вход

Карта на методите

Обкръжението на сродните методи — изберете възел, за да го разгледате.

Източници

  1. Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781-795. DOI: 10.2307/2095325
  2. Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 9780226292625

Как да цитирате тази страница

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Boundary-Work Analysis (Demarcation of Science). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/bg/science-technology-studies/boundary-work-analysis

Кой метод?

Поставете този метод до най-близките му сродни методи и ги четете едно до друго — библиотеката полага книгите на масата; изборът е ваш.

Сравняване едно до друго

Цитиран в

ScholarGateBoundary-Work Analysis (Boundary-Work Analysis (Demarcation of Science)). Извлечено на 2026-06-24 от https://scholargate.app/bg/science-technology-studies/boundary-work-analysis · Набор от данни: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026