Bureaucratic Reputation Analysis
Bureaucratic reputation analysis is an analytical framework for explaining the behaviour, power and autonomy of public agencies through the lens of their reputation — the set of symbolic beliefs about an agency's capacities, intentions and history held by its many audiences. Developed by Daniel Carpenter, notably in his 2001 study of how U.S. executive agencies forged autonomy, and elaborated with George Krause, the framework treats reputation as a strategic asset that agencies cultivate and protect. It distinguishes performative, moral, technical and procedural dimensions of reputation and traces how reputational concerns drive what agencies do.
Прочетете целия метод
Влезте с безплатен профил, за да прочетете този раздел.
Карта на методите
Обкръжението на сродните методи — изберете възел, за да го разгледате.
Източници
- Carpenter, D. P. (2001). The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN: 9780691070100
- Carpenter, D. P., & Krause, G. A. (2012). Reputation and Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 72(1), 26–32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02506.x ↗
Как да цитирате тази страница
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Bureaucratic Reputation Analysis of Public Agencies. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/bg/public-administration/bureaucratic-reputation-analysis
Кой метод?
Поставете този метод до най-близките му сродни методи и ги четете едно до друго — библиотеката полага книгите на масата; изборът е ваш.
- New Public Management AssessmentPublic Administration↔ сравняване
- Regulatory Enforcement AnalysisPublic Administration↔ сравняване
- Transparency IndexPublic Administration↔ сравняване
- Whole-of-Government AnalysisPublic Administration↔ сравняване
Цитиран в
Подобни методи
Забелязахте ли проблем на тази страница? Съобщете или предложете поправка →