Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Wordfish× | Wordscores× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област | Психометрия | Психометрия |
| Семейство | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Година на възникване≠ | 2008 | 2003 |
| Създател≠ | Jonathan Slapin, Svenja-Sophia Proksch | Michael Laver, Kenneth Benoit, John Garry |
| Тип≠ | Generative text model for dimension reduction | Text analysis and dimension reduction |
| Основополагащ източник≠ | Slapin, J. B., & Proksch, S. O. (2008). A scaling model for estimating time-series party positions from texts. Journal of Politics, 70(3), 554-569. DOI ↗ | Laver, M., Benoit, K., & Garry, J. (2003). Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 311-331. DOI ↗ |
| Други названия | — | — |
| Свързани | 5 | 5 |
| Резюме≠ | Wordfish is a statistical model for scaling documents on latent dimensions, developed by Slapin and Proksch (2008). Unlike reference-based methods like Wordscores, Wordfish uses a Poisson generative model to jointly estimate word frequencies and document positions without requiring reference texts or manual annotation. It is particularly useful for estimating time-series changes in policy positions and can scale documents from multiple languages simultaneously. | Wordscores is a text-based scaling method developed by Laver, Benoit, and Garry (2003) that estimates the policy positions of political actors based on word frequencies in their texts. By comparing word usage in reference texts of known positions with test texts, the method infers the latent political dimension of any document without requiring manual coding or training data. |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|