ScholarGate
Асистент

Сравнение на методи

Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.

Триангулирани полеви бележки×Проверка от членовете и валидиране от респонденти×Изследване с комбинирани методи×
ОбластМетодология на проучваниятаКачествени изследванияКачествени методи
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Година на възникване1970s–1980s1985
СъздателNorman K. Denzin (triangulation); Yvonna Lincoln & Egon Guba (trustworthiness framework)Yvonna Lincoln and Egon Guba
ТипQualitative data collection and verification techniqueMethodResearch design framework
Основополагащ източникDenzin, N. K. (1978). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. link ↗Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0803924314Creswell, J.W. & Plano Clark, V.L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379
Други названияmulti-source field notes, cross-observer field notes, triangulated observation notes, TFNmember validation, respondent validation, participant feedback, credibility checkKarma Yöntem Araştırması (Mixed Methods), multi-method research, triangulation design
Свързани544
РезюмеTriangulated Field Notes is a qualitative data collection technique in which field notes are recorded independently by multiple observers, from multiple vantage points, or at multiple time points and then systematically compared to strengthen the credibility and completeness of observational data. Rooted in Denzin's triangulation framework and Lincoln and Guba's trustworthiness criteria, the approach counters observer bias by cross-checking accounts before analysis begins.Member checking is a quality assurance procedure in qualitative research in which the researcher shares preliminary findings, interpretations, or analytical themes with research participants and asks whether the findings accurately reflect their perspectives and experiences. Developed by Lincoln and Guba (1985) as a trustworthiness criterion, member checking is considered a key method for ensuring credibility and reducing researcher misinterpretation. The goal is to verify that the researcher has understood participants correctly and that interpretations are grounded in participants' actual meaning-making, not the researcher's assumptions. Member checking can occur at different points in research (after individual interviews, after initial analysis, or after draft findings are written) and take different forms (individual feedback, group validation, interactive discussion).Mixed methods research is a systematic research design in which quantitative and qualitative data are collected and analysed within a single study. Formalised by Creswell and Plano Clark (2003, 3rd ed. 2018), it offers three principal design variants — concurrent, sequential, and transformative — and strengthens findings through triangulation across both data strands.
ScholarGateНабор от данни
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED

Към търсенето Изтегляне на слайдове

ScholarGateСравнение на методи: Triangulated Field Notes · Member Checking and Respondent Validation · Mixed Methods Research. Извлечено на 2026-06-19 от https://scholargate.app/bg/compare