Сравнение на методи

	Триангулирани полеви бележки	Проверка от членовете и валидиране от респонденти
Област	Методология на проучванията	Качествени изследвания
Семейство	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Година на възникване	1970s–1980s	1985
Създател	Norman K. Denzin (triangulation); Yvonna Lincoln & Egon Guba (trustworthiness framework)	Yvonna Lincoln and Egon Guba
Тип	Qualitative data collection and verification technique	Method
Основополагащ източник	Denzin, N. K. (1978). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.	Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0803924314
Други названия	multi-source field notes, cross-observer field notes, triangulated observation notes, TFN	member validation, respondent validation, participant feedback, credibility check
Свързани	5	4
Резюме	Triangulated Field Notes is a qualitative data collection technique in which field notes are recorded independently by multiple observers, from multiple vantage points, or at multiple time points and then systematically compared to strengthen the credibility and completeness of observational data. Rooted in Denzin's triangulation framework and Lincoln and Guba's trustworthiness criteria, the approach counters observer bias by cross-checking accounts before analysis begins.	Member checking is a quality assurance procedure in qualitative research in which the researcher shares preliminary findings, interpretations, or analytical themes with research participants and asks whether the findings accurately reflect their perspectives and experiences. Developed by Lincoln and Guba (1985) as a trustworthiness criterion, member checking is considered a key method for ensuring credibility and reducing researcher misinterpretation. The goal is to verify that the researcher has understood participants correctly and that interpretations are grounded in participants' actual meaning-making, not the researcher's assumptions. Member checking can occur at different points in research (after individual interviews, after initial analysis, or after draft findings are written) and take different forms (individual feedback, group validation, interactive discussion).