Сравнение на методи

	Transition Management	Multi-Level Perspective on Transitions
Област	Science Technology Studies	Science Technology Studies
Семейство	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Година на възникване	2001	2002
Създател	Jan Rotmans, René Kemp & Derk Loorbach	Frank W. Geels (building on Arie Rip and René Kemp)
Тип	Prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework	Conceptual framework and analytic method for sociotechnical change
Основополагащ източник	Loorbach, D. (2010). Transition management for sustainable development: a prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance, 23(1), 161-183.	Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1257-1274.
Други названия	TM, Transition governance framework, Transition arena approach	MLP, Multi-level perspective framework, Sociotechnical transitions analysis
Свързани	4	4
Резюме	Transition Management (TM) is a prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework for deliberately steering long-term, structural change in sociotechnical systems toward sustainability. Rather than predicting or controlling outcomes, it organises a cyclical, participatory process—strategic, tactical, operational, and reflexive activities—through which a small group of frontrunners develops shared long-term visions, translates them into agendas and coalitions, mobilises experiments, and continuously monitors and learns. It applies insights from transitions research to the question of how societies might govern their own transformations.	The Multi-Level Perspective (MLP) is a middle-range framework for analysing how large sociotechnical systems—energy, mobility, food, water—shift from one dominant configuration to another. It locates change in the interplay of three analytic levels: protected niches where radical novelties incubate, the incumbent sociotechnical regime that structures ordinary practice, and a slow-moving exogenous landscape. Transitions occur when landscape pressures destabilise the regime and open windows of opportunity for maturing niche innovations to break through.