ScholarGate
Асистент

Сравнение на методи

Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.

Мерки за опашен риск (очаквана недостатъчност, спектрални, ефектилни)×Метод на най-малките квадрати (МНК)×
ОбластФинансиИконометрия
СемействоRegression modelRegression model
Година на възникване19992019
СъздателArtzner, Delbaen, Eber & Heath (coherent risk axioms); Acerbi & Tasche (Expected Shortfall)Wooldridge (textbook treatment); classical least squares
ТипCoherent tail risk measureLinear regression
Основополагащ източникArtzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.-M. & Heath, D. (1999). Coherent Measures of Risk. Mathematical Finance, 9(3), 203–228. DOI ↗Wooldridge, J. M. (2019). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (7th ed.). Cengage Learning. ISBN: 978-1337558860
Други названияexpected shortfall, conditional value at risk, CVaR, spectral risk measureordinary least squares, classical linear regression, linear regression, en küçük kareler regresyonu
Свързани55
РезюмеTail risk measures quantify the loss distribution beyond Value-at-Risk (VaR). Expected Shortfall — the expected loss given that VaR is exceeded — is the leading coherent risk measure, formalised by Artzner, Delbaen, Eber and Heath (1999) and shown to be coherent by Acerbi and Tasche (2002). Spectral and expectile-based measures generalise it.Ordinary Least Squares is the classical linear regression method that explains a continuous outcome as a linear combination of predictors. It estimates the coefficients by minimising the sum of squared residuals, and under the Gauss-Markov assumptions these estimates are the best linear unbiased estimator (BLUE).
ScholarGateНабор от данни
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED

Към търсенето Изтегляне на слайдове

ScholarGateСравнение на методи: Tail Risk Measures · OLS Regression. Извлечено на 2026-06-18 от https://scholargate.app/bg/compare