Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Пространствено заякчено точно съвпадение (Spatial CEM)× | Съгласуване по показател на склонност× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област≠ | Причинно-следствено заключение | Статистика за изследвания |
| Семейство≠ | Regression model | Process / pipeline |
| Година на възникване≠ | 2012 (CEM foundation); spatial extension in applied literature 2015-present | 1983 |
| Създател≠ | Iacus, King & Porro (CEM foundation, 2012); extended to spatial contexts by applied spatial econometricians | Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin |
| Тип≠ | Quasi-experimental matching estimator with spatial covariates | Method |
| Основополагащ източник≠ | Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗ | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗ |
| Други названия≠ | Spatial CEM, Geographic CEM, Spatial exact matching, CEM with spatial covariates | PSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance |
| Свързани≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Резюме≠ | Spatial Coarsened Exact Matching applies the Coarsened Exact Matching framework to study designs involving geographic units — neighbourhoods, census tracts, municipalities, or grid cells. Covariates are coarsened into discrete bins and units are matched exactly on those bins, with spatial attributes (location, adjacency, geographic characteristics) incorporated as matching dimensions to control for spatial confounding. | Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias. |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|