ScholarGate
Асистент

Сравнение на методи

Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.

Self-Anchored Rating Scale×Single-System Design×
ОбластSocial WorkSocial Work
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Година на възникване20092009
СъздателCodified in social-work practice evaluation by Bloom, Fischer & OrmeMartin Bloom, Joel Fischer & John G. Orme (codification in social work)
ТипIndividualized self-report rating scale with client-defined anchorsTime-series design for evaluating intervention with a single client system
Основополагащ източникBloom, M., Fischer, J., & Orme, J. G. (2009). Evaluating Practice: Guidelines for the Accountable Professional (6th ed.). Pearson/Allyn & Bacon. ISBN: 9780205458066Bloom, M., Fischer, J., & Orme, J. G. (2009). Evaluating Practice: Guidelines for the Accountable Professional (6th ed.). Pearson/Allyn & Bacon. ISBN: 9780205458066
Други названияSARS, Self-Anchored Scale, Individualized Rating Scale, Client-Anchored ScaleSingle-Subject Design, Single-Case Design, N-of-1 Design, Single-System Evaluation
Свързани44
РезюмеA self-anchored rating scale (SARS) is an individualized measurement tool in which a client rates a personally relevant target — a feeling, thought, or behavior that may not be captured by any standardized instrument — on a fixed numeric scale whose points the client and worker have anchored in advance with concrete, individually meaningful descriptions. Widely taught in social-work practice evaluation through Bloom, Fischer, and Orme's work, it lets a worker measure highly idiosyncratic internal states repeatedly and reliably, supplying the data for single-system designs when no off-the-shelf scale fits.A single-system design is a time-series approach to evaluating practice in which a single client system — an individual, family, group, or organization — is measured repeatedly on a clearly defined target before and during (and sometimes after) an intervention. By tracking the same system over time rather than comparing a treatment group to a control group, it lets a practitioner judge whether their own intervention is associated with change in the people they actually serve. It is the methodological backbone of the 'accountable professional' tradition codified by Bloom, Fischer, and Orme.
ScholarGateНабор от данни
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED

Към търсенето Изтегляне на слайдове

ScholarGateСравнение на методи: Self-Anchored Rating Scale · Single-System Design. Извлечено на 2026-06-25 от https://scholargate.app/bg/compare