ScholarGate
Асистент

Сравнение на методи

Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.

Изследвания за робустна проверка на модели×Изследване за тестване на модели×
ОбластДизайн на изследванетоДизайн на изследването
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Година на възникване1988–19981970s (Joreskog 1969–1973); widely adopted in social sciences by the 1980s–1990s
СъздателAlbert Satorra & Peter M. Bentler; Ke-Hai YuanKarl G. Joreskog (SEM/LISREL framework); formalized through structural equation modeling tradition
ТипQuantitative model-testing research design with robust estimationConfirmatory quantitative research design
Основополагащ източникSatorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Sage. link ↗Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press. ISBN: 978-1462523344
Други названияrobust SEM, robust structural model testing, robust fit evaluation, robust model evaluation researchmodel-based research, structural model testing, theory-testing research, MTR
Свързани65
РезюмеRobust model testing research applies structural or path models to data while explicitly accounting for violations of multivariate normality and other distributional assumptions. Rather than discarding non-normal data or forcing transformations, it uses corrected estimators — most notably the Satorra-Bentler scaled chi-square and Yuan-Bentler robust standard errors — to produce trustworthy fit indices and parameter estimates even when classical maximum likelihood assumptions are breached.Model testing research is a confirmatory quantitative design in which the researcher specifies a theoretical model — depicting hypothesized relationships among constructs — and then tests how well that model fits empirical data. Drawing primarily on structural equation modeling (SEM) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), it evaluates whether the data-implied covariance structure is consistent with the theoretically derived one, yielding fit indices that indicate model-data correspondence.
ScholarGateНабор от данни
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED

Към търсенето Изтегляне на слайдове

ScholarGateСравнение на методи: Robust Model Testing Research · Model Testing Research. Извлечено на 2026-06-15 от https://scholargate.app/bg/compare