ScholarGate
Асистент

Сравнение на методи

Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.

Оценка на политики с обратно претегляне по вероятност×Претегляне с оценка на склонността (PSW / IPW)×
ОбластПричинно-следствено заключениеПричинно-следствено заключение
СемействоRegression modelRegression model
Година на възникване1952 (IPW origin); 2000s (policy evaluation application)1983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
СъздателHorvitz & Thompson (1952); extended to causal policy settings by Robins, Hernan & Brumback (2000) and Imbens & Wooldridge (2009)Rosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
ТипReweighting estimator for causal policy analysisCausal inference / reweighting
Основополагащ източникImbens, G. W., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(1), 5-86. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
Други названияIPW policy evaluation, propensity-weighted policy analysis, inverse probability of treatment weightingPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
Свързани66
РезюмеPolicy evaluation inverse probability weighting (IPW) uses estimated propensity scores to reweight observed units so that the weighted sample mimics a randomised experiment. Each unit is weighted by the inverse of its probability of receiving the policy, creating a pseudo-population in which treatment assignment is independent of observed covariates and the average treatment effect (ATE) can be read off directly.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateНабор от данни
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED

Към търсенето Изтегляне на слайдове

ScholarGateСравнение на методи: Policy Evaluation Inverse Probability Weighting · Propensity Score Weighting. Извлечено на 2026-06-19 от https://scholargate.app/bg/compare