Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Person-Organization Fit× | Скала за организационна ангажираност× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област | Организационно поведение | Организационно поведение |
| Семейство≠ | Latent structure | Process / pipeline |
| Година на възникване≠ | 1996 | 1991 |
| Създател≠ | Amy L. Kristof; Amy Kristof-Brown, Ryan Zimmerman & Erin Johnson | John P. Meyer and Natalie J. Allen |
| Тип≠ | Value-congruence measurement and fit model | Self-report questionnaire |
| Основополагащ източник≠ | Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 1-49. DOI ↗ | Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89. DOI ↗ |
| Други названия≠ | P-O Fit, PO Fit, Value Congruence, Person-Environment Fit | OCS, Meyer & Allen Scale |
| Свързани≠ | 3 | 5 |
| Резюме≠ | Person-organization (P-O) fit is the organizational-behavior construct describing the compatibility between an individual and the organization they work for, most often operationalized as the congruence between personal and organizational values. Amy Kristof's 1996 integrative review consolidated a scattered literature into a coherent framework, distinguishing supplementary fit (sharing the same characteristics) from complementary fit (each party supplying what the other needs) and separating perceived from actual congruence. Cable and Judge's 1996 work showed that value congruence shapes job-choice decisions and organizational entry, and that subjective fit perceptions predict attitudes above objective profile similarity. Kristof-Brown, Zimmerman, and Johnson's 2005 meta-analysis quantified the consequences across fit types, finding P-O fit a strong correlate of satisfaction, commitment, and intent to stay. Together these works made fit a measurable, predictive construct rather than a loose metaphor. P-O fit now anchors research on recruitment, socialization, and turnover. | The Organizational Commitment Scale (OCS), developed by Meyer and Allen in 1991, measures three distinct dimensions of organizational commitment: affective commitment (emotional attachment), continuance commitment (perceived cost of leaving), and normative commitment (sense of obligation). This three-component model has become foundational in understanding employee retention, engagement, and organizational attachment. |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|