ScholarGate
Асистент

Сравнение на методи

Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.

Множествена импутация×Съгласуване по показател на склонност×
ОбластСтатистикаСтатистика за изследвания
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Година на възникване19871983
СъздателDonald B. RubinPaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
ТипMissing-data handling procedureMethod
Основополагащ източникRubin, D.B. (1987). Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. Wiley. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Други названияMICE, Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations, Çoklu Atama (Multiple Imputation — MICE)PSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Свързани13
РезюмеMultiple Imputation (MI), formally introduced by Donald B. Rubin in 1987, is a principled statistical procedure for handling missing data. Rather than replacing each missing value once, MI fills the gaps m times — each time drawing plausible values from the posterior predictive distribution of the missing data — producing m complete datasets. Each dataset is analysed independently, and the results are combined into a single set of estimates using Rubin's pooling rules. The MICE variant (Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations), popularised by van Buuren and Groothuis-Oudshoorn (2011), extends the approach to mixed variable types by imputing each variable in turn through a sequence of conditional regression models.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateНабор от данни
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED

Към търсенето Изтегляне на слайдове

ScholarGateСравнение на методи: Multiple Imputation · Propensity Score Matching. Извлечено на 2026-06-17 от https://scholargate.app/bg/compare