ScholarGate
Асистент

Сравнение на методи

Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.

Методи за съпоставяне (CEM / оптимално / генетично)×Локален среден ефект от третиране (LATE / CACE)×
ОбластПричинно-следствено заключениеПричинно-следствено заключение
СемействоRegression modelRegression model
Година на възникване20121994
СъздателIacus, King & Porro (CEM); Hansen (optimal/full matching)Imbens & Angrist (1994); Angrist, Imbens & Rubin (1996)
ТипMatching for causal inferenceInstrumental-variable causal estimand
Основополагащ източникIacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗Imbens, G. W., & Angrist, J. D. (1994). Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects. Econometrica, 62(2), 467-475. DOI ↗
Други названияcoarsened exact matching, optimal matching, genetic matching, CEMLATE, CACE, complier average causal effect, Yerel Ortalama Tedavi Etkisi (LATE / CACE)
Свързани55
РезюмеMatching Methods are a family of causal-inference techniques beyond propensity-score matching that pair treated and control units with similar covariates so that a treatment effect can be read off the balanced sample. The family includes Coarsened Exact Matching (Iacus, King & Porro, 2012), optimal matching, and genetic matching.The Local Average Treatment Effect is an instrumental-variable estimand, introduced by Imbens and Angrist (1994) and formalised with Rubin (1996), that recovers the average treatment effect for the subpopulation of compliers — units whose treatment status is actually moved by the instrument. It is closely tied to compliance analysis.
ScholarGateНабор от данни
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED

Към търсенето Изтегляне на слайдове

ScholarGateСравнение на методи: Matching Methods · Local Average Treatment Effect. Извлечено на 2026-06-17 от https://scholargate.app/bg/compare