Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Скала за лидерство при внедряване (Implementation Leadership Scale, ILS)× | Мащаб за отношение към основана на доказателства практика (EBPAS-36)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област | Наука за внедряването | Наука за внедряването |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Година на възникване≠ | 2014 | 2005 |
| Създател≠ | Gregory A. Aarons, PhD; Michelle G. Ehrhart, PhD; Lydia R. Farahnak, PhD | Gregory A. Aarons, PhD |
| Тип | Self-report questionnaire | Self-report questionnaire |
| Основополагащ източник≠ | Aarons, G. A., Ehrhart, M. G., Farahnak, L. R., & Sklar, M. (2014). Aligning leadership across systems and organizations to develop integrated care. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 41(2), 159–178. link ↗ | Aarons, G. A. (2011). Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale-50 (EBPAS-50) and EBPAS-36 short form: Psychometric properties. Implementation Science, 6(1), 89. link ↗ |
| Други названия | ILS, Implementation Leadership, ILS-12 | EBPAS, EBPAS-36, Evidence-Based Practice Attitude |
| Свързани | 5 | 5 |
| Резюме≠ | The Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS) is a 12-item self-report measure that assesses unit-level leadership behaviors critical to successful implementation of evidence-based practices and innovations. Developed by Aarons, Ehrhart, and Farahnak in 2014, the ILS measures four dimensions of implementation leadership: proactive leadership, knowledgeable leadership, supportive leadership, and perseverant leadership. This brief, validated instrument is designed to capture frontline leaders' (managers, supervisors, unit heads) implementation-specific behaviors as perceived by clinical staff, and is widely used in healthcare implementation research to evaluate leadership effectiveness and predict implementation success. | The EBPAS-36 is a 36-item self-report questionnaire that assesses clinicians' and organizational leaders' attitudes toward adopting and implementing evidence-based practices (EBP). Developed by Aarons in 2005 and refined through multiple validation studies, it measures four core dimensions: perceived requirements to adopt EBP, the appeal and usefulness of EBP to individual practice, organizational openness to innovation, and perceived divergence between current practice and EBP requirements. The EBPAS is widely used in healthcare, mental health, child welfare, and substance abuse treatment settings to predict adoption readiness and guide implementation planning. |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|