ScholarGate
Асистент

Сравнение на методи

Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.

Динамично съгласуване по показател на склонност×Претегляне с оценка на склонността (PSW / IPW)×
ОбластПричинно-следствено заключениеПричинно-следствено заключение
СемействоRegression modelRegression model
Година на възникване1986-20101983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
СъздателRobins (1986) on sequential treatments; Lechner & Miquel (2010) on dynamic matchingRosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
ТипSequential causal matchingCausal inference / reweighting
Основополагащ източникLechner, M., & Miquel, R. (2010). Identification of the effects of dynamic treatments by sequential conditional independence assumptions. Empirical Economics, 39(1), 111-137. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
Други названияdynamic PSM, sequential propensity score matching, longitudinal propensity matching, DPSMPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
Свързани66
РезюмеDynamic Propensity Score Matching (DPSM) extends classic propensity score matching to settings where treatment is assigned repeatedly over time and earlier treatment choices influence later ones. It estimates the causal effect of entire treatment sequences or regime changes by constructing matched comparisons at each decision point using the full history of covariates and prior treatments.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateНабор от данни
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED

Към търсенето Изтегляне на слайдове

ScholarGateСравнение на методи: Dynamic Propensity Score Matching · Propensity Score Weighting. Извлечено на 2026-06-19 от https://scholargate.app/bg/compare