Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Динамично съгласуване по показател на склонност× | Претегляне с обратна вероятност на лечението (IPW / IPTW)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област | Причинно-следствено заключение | Причинно-следствено заключение |
| Семейство | Regression model | Regression model |
| Година на възникване≠ | 1986-2010 | 2000 |
| Създател≠ | Robins (1986) on sequential treatments; Lechner & Miquel (2010) on dynamic matching | Robins, Hernán & Brumback |
| Тип≠ | Sequential causal matching | Causal inference weighting estimator |
| Основополагащ източник≠ | Lechner, M., & Miquel, R. (2010). Identification of the effects of dynamic treatments by sequential conditional independence assumptions. Empirical Economics, 39(1), 111-137. DOI ↗ | Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗ |
| Други названия≠ | dynamic PSM, sequential propensity score matching, longitudinal propensity matching, DPSM | IPW, IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting, marginal structural model weighting |
| Свързани≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Резюме≠ | Dynamic Propensity Score Matching (DPSM) extends classic propensity score matching to settings where treatment is assigned repeatedly over time and earlier treatment choices influence later ones. It estimates the causal effect of entire treatment sequences or regime changes by constructing matched comparisons at each decision point using the full history of covariates and prior treatments. | Inverse Probability Weighting is a causal-inference method that assigns each observation a weight equal to the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received. Introduced by Robins, Hernán and Brumback (2000) for marginal structural models, it builds a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of measured confounders, balancing selection bias. |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|