Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Динамично балансиране на ентропията× | Претегляне с оценка на склонността (PSW / IPW)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област | Причинно-следствено заключение | Причинно-следствено заключение |
| Семейство | Regression model | Regression model |
| Година на възникване≠ | 2012-2018 | 1983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator) |
| Създател≠ | Hainmueller (2012) for static entropy balancing; extended to dynamic settings by Blackwell and Glynn (2018) and subsequent methodologists | Rosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting) |
| Тип≠ | Causal inference / weighting estimator | Causal inference / reweighting |
| Основополагащ източник≠ | Hainmueller, J. (2012). Entropy Balancing for Causal Effects: A Multivariate Reweighting Method to Produce Balanced Samples in Observational Studies. Political Analysis, 20(1), 25-46. DOI ↗ | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗ |
| Други названия | DEB, longitudinal entropy balancing, entropy balancing with time-varying treatment, sequential entropy balancing | PSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting |
| Свързани | 6 | 6 |
| Резюме≠ | Dynamic Entropy Balancing extends the entropy balancing reweighting approach to settings with time-varying treatments in panel or longitudinal data. It constructs unit weights at each time period such that the covariate distributions of treated and comparison units are balanced on specified moments, adjusting sequentially for prior treatment history and time-varying confounders to estimate the causal effect of treatment sequences on outcomes. | Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003). |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|