Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Причинно-следствена идентификация с насочени ациклични графи (do-calculus)× | Sensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Confounding× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област | Причинно-следствено заключение | Причинно-следствено заключение |
| Семейство | Regression model | Regression model |
| Година на възникване≠ | 2009 | 2002 |
| Създател≠ | Judea Pearl | Paul R. Rosenbaum (bounds); Tyler J. VanderWeele & Peng Ding (E-value) |
| Тип≠ | Causal identification framework | Sensitivity analysis for causal inference |
| Основополагащ източник≠ | Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-0521895606 | Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Observational Studies (2nd ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-0387989679 |
| Други названия≠ | do-calculus, backdoor adjustment, Pearl causal identification, DAG ile Nedensel Tanımlama (do-calculus) | Rosenbaum bounds, E-value, hidden bias sensitivity analysis, unmeasured confounding sensitivity |
| Свързани | 5 | 5 |
| Резюме≠ | DAG causal identification is a framework, developed by Judea Pearl (2009), that encodes causal assumptions as a directed acyclic graph and uses the do-calculus rules to determine whether and how a causal effect can be identified from observational data. It systematically handles confounders, instrumental variables, and backdoor paths. | Sensitivity analysis for hidden bias is a family of methods that quantify how strongly an unmeasured confounder would have to operate before it could overturn a causal conclusion drawn from observational data. It was crystallised by Paul Rosenbaum's sensitivity bounds (2002) and extended by VanderWeele and Ding's E-value (2017). |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|