ScholarGate
المساعد
Process / pipelineSociology of scientific knowledge

Boundary-Work Analysis

Boundary-work analysis studies how the line between science and non-science is drawn, defended, and contested—not by philosophers laying down timeless criteria, but by actors doing rhetorical work to secure authority, resources, and credibility. Introduced by Thomas Gieryn in 1983 and elaborated in his 1999 book Cultural Boundaries of Science, the approach treats demarcation as a practical, strategic, and historically variable accomplishment. The method examines the discourse of demarcation episodes to reveal the strategies—expansion, expulsion, and protection of autonomy—through which the cultural map of science is redrawn whenever its credibility is on the line.

افتح في MethodMindقريبًاطبّق، قارن، واحصل على إرشادات
الأدوات والموارد
تنزيل الشرائح
التعلّم والاستكشاف
فيديوقريبًا

اقرأ الطريقة كاملة

للأعضاء فقط

سجّل الدخول بحساب مجاني لقراءة هذا القسم.

تسجيل الدخول

خريطة المناهج

محيط المناهج ذات الصلة — اختر عقدةً للاستكشاف.

المصادر

  1. Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781-795. DOI: 10.2307/2095325
  2. Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 9780226292625

كيف تستشهد بهذه الصفحة

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Boundary-Work Analysis (Demarcation of Science). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ar/science-technology-studies/boundary-work-analysis

أيُّ منهج؟

ضع هذا المنهج إلى جانب أقرب نظائره واقرأهما جنباً إلى جنب — المكتبة تضع الكتب على الطاولة، والاختيار لك.

قارن جنباً إلى جنب

يُستشهد بها في

ScholarGateBoundary-Work Analysis (Boundary-Work Analysis (Demarcation of Science)). استُرجع بتاريخ 2026-06-24 من https://scholargate.app/ar/science-technology-studies/boundary-work-analysis · مجموعة البيانات: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026