Authorship Attribution of Canonical Texts
Authorship attribution of canonical texts uses computational stylometry to test who wrote disputed sacred and classical writings, most famously the letters attributed to Paul. Several New Testament epistles bear Paul's name but have long been suspected, on historical and stylistic grounds, of coming from later hands; stylometry brings quantitative evidence to the question. The approach profiles each author's style from large numbers of features, especially function-word frequencies, and either classifies a disputed text to the closest candidate or verifies whether it could plausibly belong to a claimed author against a field of impostors. Jacques Savoy's 2019 study revisited the entire Pauline corpus with modern methods, including Burrows's Delta, and found that it clusters into groups consistent with the traditional distinction between undisputed and disputed letters.
اقرأ الطريقة كاملة
سجّل الدخول بحساب مجاني لقراءة هذا القسم.
خريطة المناهج
محيط المناهج ذات الصلة — اختر عقدةً للاستكشاف.
المصادر
- Savoy, J. (2019). Authorship of Pauline epistles revisited. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(10), 1089-1097. DOI: 10.1002/asi.24176 ↗
- Burrows, J. (2002). 'Delta': a Measure of Stylistic Difference and a Guide to Likely Authorship. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 17(3), 267-287. DOI: 10.1093/llc/17.3.267 ↗
كيف تستشهد بهذه الصفحة
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Authorship Attribution of Canonical Texts (Computational Verification of Disputed Sacred Writings). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ar/religious-studies/authorship-attribution-canonical-texts
أيُّ منهج؟
ضع هذا المنهج إلى جانب أقرب نظائره واقرأهما جنباً إلى جنب — المكتبة تضع الكتب على الطاولة، والاختيار لك.
- Intertextuality AnalysisReligious Studies↔ قارن
- Scripture StylometryReligious Studies↔ قارن
- Source Criticism (Documentary Hypothesis)Religious Studies↔ قارن
- Variant Collation and CBGMReligious Studies↔ قارن