ScholarGate
المساعد

قارن الطرق

راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.

البحث السببي المقارن المدعوم بالمحاكاة×مطابقة درجات الميل×
المجالتصميم البحثإحصاء البحث
العائلةProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سنة النشأةLate 20th–early 21st century (hybrid approach formalized ~1990s–2000s)1983
صاحب الطريقةSynthesized from causal-comparative tradition (Donald T. Campbell; Julian Stanley) and simulation methodologyPaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
النوعHybrid observational-simulation designMethod
المصدر التأسيسيFraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 978-1260087352Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
الأسماء البديلةsimulation-augmented causal-comparative design, ex post facto simulation design, SA-CCR, causal-comparative with simulation validationPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
ذات صلة43
الملخصSimulation-assisted causal-comparative research is a hybrid observational design that combines the ex post facto logic of causal-comparative studies — comparing groups that differ on a naturally occurring variable — with computational simulation to strengthen causal inference, test counterfactuals, and assess the robustness of observed group differences. By augmenting real-world comparisons with simulated scenarios, researchers can explore causal mechanisms that cannot be manipulated experimentally.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED

انتقل إلى البحث تنزيل الشرائح

ScholarGateقارن الطرق: Simulation-assisted causal-comparative research · Propensity Score Matching. استُرجع بتاريخ 2026-06-18 من https://scholargate.app/ar/compare