ScholarGate
المساعد

قارن الطرق

راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.

صلاحية المحتوى للشكل المختصر×تطوير المقياس المختصر×
المجالالقياس النفسيالقياس النفسي
العائلةLatent structureLatent structure
سنة النشأة1995–20001990s–2000s
صاحب الطريقةMessick (validity framework); Smith et al. (short-form standards)Multiple contributors; foundational critique by Smith, McCarthy & Anderson (2000); practical guidance by Stanton et al. (2002)
النوعValidity evaluationScale development methodology
المصدر التأسيسيSmith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111. DOI ↗Stanton, J. M., Sinar, E. F., Balzer, W. K., & Smith, P. C. (2002). Issues and strategies for reducing the length of self-report scales. Personnel Psychology, 55(1), 167–194. DOI ↗
الأسماء البديلةabbreviated scale content validity, short-scale content coverage, brief form content validity, content validity for short formsscale abbreviation, abbreviated scale development, short-scale construction, item reduction methodology
ذات صلة65
الملخصShort-form content validity evaluates whether items retained in an abbreviated scale still adequately represent every substantive facet of the construct measured by the original full-length instrument. It ensures that shortening a scale does not hollow out the conceptual domain it was designed to cover.Short-form scale development is the systematic process of reducing a full-length psychological scale to a smaller subset of items while preserving the construct validity, reliability, and measurement properties of the original instrument. It is widely used when administration burden must be minimised without sacrificing psychometric quality.
ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED

انتقل إلى البحث تنزيل الشرائح

ScholarGateقارن الطرق: Short form content validity · Short-Form Scale Development. استُرجع بتاريخ 2026-06-17 من https://scholargate.app/ar/compare