ScholarGate
المساعد

قارن الطرق

راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.

الصلاحية القانونية القوية×الصلاحية التقاربية×
المجالالقياس النفسيالقياس النفسي
العائلةLatent structureLatent structure
سنة النشأة19551959
صاحب الطريقةCronbach & Meehl (seminal framework); later extended by Shadish, Cook, and CampbellDonald T. Campbell & Donald W. Fiske
النوعValidity assessment / construct validationValidity evidence / construct validation
المصدر التأسيسيCronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
الأسماء البديلةnomological network validity, robust validity testing, nomological validity, RNVconvergent construct validity, convergence validity, AVE-based convergent validity
ذات صلة54
الملخصRobust nomological validity evaluates whether a psychological construct relates to theoretically expected variables in the predicted directions, using statistically robust estimation methods that remain trustworthy when distributional assumptions are violated. It tests the construct's place within its nomological network — the web of theoretical relationships that define its meaning.Convergent validity is the degree to which multiple indicators that are theoretically expected to measure the same construct actually correlate with one another. It is one of the two complementary forms of construct validity identified by Campbell and Fiske (1959) and is now routinely assessed via factor loadings and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) statistic in SEM-based scale validation.
ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED

انتقل إلى البحث تنزيل الشرائح

ScholarGateقارن الطرق: Robust Nomological Validity · Convergent Validity. استُرجع بتاريخ 2026-06-17 من https://scholargate.app/ar/compare