ScholarGate
المساعد

قارن الطرق

راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.

الصلاحية القانونية القوية×تحليل العوامل التأكيدي (CFA)×
المجالالقياس النفسيالقياس النفسي
العائلةLatent structureLatent structure
سنة النشأة19551969
صاحب الطريقةCronbach & Meehl (seminal framework); later extended by Shadish, Cook, and CampbellKarl Gustav Jöreskog
النوعValidity assessment / construct validationHypothesis-testing latent variable model
المصدر التأسيسيCronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗
الأسماء البديلةnomological network validity, robust validity testing, nomological validity, RNVCFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis
ذات صلة54
الملخصRobust nomological validity evaluates whether a psychological construct relates to theoretically expected variables in the predicted directions, using statistically robust estimation methods that remain trustworthy when distributional assumptions are violated. It tests the construct's place within its nomological network — the web of theoretical relationships that define its meaning.Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing.
ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED

انتقل إلى البحث تنزيل الشرائح

ScholarGateقارن الطرق: Robust Nomological Validity · Confirmatory factor analysis. استُرجع بتاريخ 2026-06-17 من https://scholargate.app/ar/compare