قارن الطرق
راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.
| Participatory Evaluation× | Developmental Evaluation× | |
|---|---|---|
| المجال | Public Policy | Public Policy |
| العائلة | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| سنة النشأة≠ | 1998 | 2011 |
| صاحب الطريقة≠ | J. Bradley Cousins & Elizabeth Whitmore | Michael Quinn Patton |
| النوع≠ | Collaborative, stakeholder-engaged evaluation approach | Complexity-informed evaluation approach for innovation |
| المصدر التأسيسي≠ | Cousins, J. B., & Whitmore, E. (1998). Framing participatory evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 1998(80), 5–23. DOI ↗ | Patton, M. Q. (2011). Developmental Evaluation: Applying Complexity Concepts to Enhance Innovation and Use. New York: Guilford Press. ISBN: 9781606238721 |
| الأسماء البديلة | Collaborative Evaluation, Stakeholder-Based Evaluation, Practical Participatory Evaluation | DE, Patton Developmental Evaluation, Complexity-Informed Evaluation |
| ذات صلة | 4 | 4 |
| الملخص≠ | Participatory evaluation is a family of approaches in which stakeholders — program staff, beneficiaries, community members — are engaged as active partners in conducting the evaluation rather than as passive subjects of it. In their influential 1998 framing, J. Bradley Cousins and Elizabeth Whitmore distinguished two streams: practical participatory evaluation, oriented to improving program decisions and use, and transformative participatory evaluation, oriented to empowerment and social justice. What unites them is shared control of the inquiry, but they vary along dimensions of who participates, how much control they hold, and how deeply they are involved. | Developmental evaluation is an approach designed to support innovation and adaptation in complex, dynamic environments where the intervention itself is still emerging. Articulated by Michael Quinn Patton in his 2011 book, it abandons the assumption of a fixed, pre-specified model to be tested, and instead embeds an evaluator within the design team to provide real-time feedback that informs ongoing development. Its purpose is development — helping social innovators learn, adapt and respond as conditions change — rather than the improvement of a settled program (formative) or the judgement of a completed one (summative). |
| ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات ↗ |
|
|