ScholarGate
المساعد

قارن الطرق

راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.

صلاحية التمييز متعددة المستويات×تحليل العوامل التأكيدي (CFA)×
المجالالقياس النفسيالقياس النفسي
العائلةLatent structureLatent structure
سنة النشأة20051969
صاحب الطريقةDyer, Hanges, & Hall; Chen, Sousa, & WestKarl Gustav Jöreskog
النوعValidity evaluation within multilevel CFAHypothesis-testing latent variable model
المصدر التأسيسيDyer, N. G., Hanges, P. J., & Hall, R. J. (2005). Applying multilevel confirmatory factor analysis techniques to the study of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 16(1), 149–167. DOI ↗Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗
الأسماء البديلةmultilevel DV, cross-level discriminant validity, hierarchical discriminant validity, ML-DVCFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis
ذات صلة54
الملخصMultilevel discriminant validity evaluates whether theoretically distinct constructs are empirically separable when data are nested within higher-level units such as teams, schools, or organizations. It extends single-level discriminant validity checks into a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework, verifying that constructs are distinguishable both within and between levels simultaneously.Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing.
ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED

انتقل إلى البحث تنزيل الشرائح

ScholarGateقارن الطرق: Multilevel Discriminant Validity · Confirmatory factor analysis. استُرجع بتاريخ 2026-06-18 من https://scholargate.app/ar/compare