قارن الطرق
راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.
| التحليل التفاضلي للأداء على البنود متعدد المستويات (DIF متعدد المستويات)× | نظرية الاستجابة للمفردة (IRT)× | |
|---|---|---|
| المجال | القياس النفسي | القياس النفسي |
| العائلة | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| سنة النشأة≠ | 2001 | 1952–1968 |
| صاحب الطريقة≠ | Kamata (2001) and subsequent multilevel IRT/DIF literature | Frederic M. Lord (and Allan Birnbaum for the 2PL/3PL models) |
| النوع≠ | Bias detection / multilevel measurement model | Probabilistic measurement model |
| المصدر التأسيسي≠ | French, B. F., & Finch, W. H. (2008). Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis: Locating the invariant referent sets. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 15(1), 96–113. DOI ↗ | Lord, F. M. & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Addison-Wesley. link ↗ |
| الأسماء البديلة | multilevel DIF, hierarchical DIF analysis, cross-level DIF, ML-DIF | IRT, latent trait theory, item characteristic curve theory, modern test theory |
| ذات صلة | 5 | 5 |
| الملخص≠ | Multilevel DIF analysis detects whether individual test or survey items function differently across groups when respondents are clustered within higher-level units — such as students nested in schools, employees in organizations, or patients in clinics. By accounting for hierarchical data structure, it separates genuine item bias from artificial DIF signals caused by ignoring clustering. | Item response theory models the probability that a respondent answers an item correctly (or endorses it) as a function of the respondent's latent trait level and the item's own statistical properties — difficulty, discrimination, and guessing. Unlike classical test theory, IRT places persons and items on the same scale, yielding measurement that is sample-independent for items and test-independent for persons. |
| ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات ↗ |
|
|