ScholarGate
المساعد

قارن الطرق

راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.

تقييم اختبارات الفحص متعددة المراكز×الدراسة الوبائية المقطعية×
المجالعلم الأوبئةعلم الأوبئة
العائلةProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سنة النشأة1976–2003 (core diagnostic accuracy framework; multicenter STARD standards formalized 2003)1960s (formal codification); widely practiced since mid-20th century
صاحب الطريقةMethodological consensus (STARD group, Bossuyt et al.); broader diagnostic accuracy tradition rooted in Hanley & McNeil (1982) and Sackett & Haynes (1976)Classical epidemiology tradition; systematized by Brian MacMahon and Thomas Pugh (1960s)
النوعObservational diagnostic accuracy studyObservational, descriptive/analytic epidemiological design
المصدر التأسيسيBossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L. M., Lijmer, J. G., Moher, D., Rennie, D., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2003). Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative. Annals of Internal Medicine, 138(1), 40-44. DOI ↗Kelsey, J. L., Whittemore, A. S., Evans, A. S., & Thompson, W. D. (1996). Methods in Observational Epidemiology (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195080407
الأسماء البديلةmulticenter diagnostic accuracy study, multisite screening evaluation, multicenter test performance study, multicenter DTA studyprevalence study, cross-sectional survey, transversal study, cross-sectional design
ذات صلة66
الملخصA multicenter screening test evaluation measures the diagnostic accuracy of a screening test — its sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and ROC-curve area — by enrolling participants across two or more independent clinical sites. Conducting the study at multiple centers broadens the patient spectrum, tests generalizability across different laboratory conditions and patient populations, and produces more externally valid accuracy estimates than a single-center study.A cross-sectional epidemiological study measures the exposure(s) and outcome(s) of interest simultaneously in a defined population at a single point in time (or over a short period). Because there is no follow-up, it is the most efficient observational design for estimating disease prevalence and for generating hypotheses about associations between risk factors and health outcomes.
ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED

انتقل إلى البحث تنزيل الشرائح

ScholarGateقارن الطرق: Multicenter Screening Test Evaluation · Cross-sectional epidemiological study. استُرجع بتاريخ 2026-06-17 من https://scholargate.app/ar/compare