ScholarGate
المساعد

قارن الطرق

راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.

منهج المقابلة المتعمقة×الانعكاسية في البحث النوعي×
المجالالبحث النوعيالبحث النوعي
العائلةProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سنة النشأة19541990
صاحب الطريقةCarl Rogers and Herbert H. HymanAnthony Giddens and Pierre Bourdieu
النوعMethodConcept
المصدر التأسيسيKvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0761908631Finlay, L. (2002). Outing the researcher: The provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 531-545. DOI ↗
الأسماء البديلةIDI, qualitative interview, one-on-one interview, in-depth interviewingreflexive practice, researcher reflexivity, positionality, reflective practice
ذات صلة54
الملخصIn-depth interviews are a qualitative research method in which a trained interviewer conducts one-on-one conversations with individual participants using open-ended questions to explore their experiences, perspectives, and understandings of a phenomenon. Developed in the 1950s by Rogers and Hyman, the method varies along a spectrum from structured (standardized question sets) to semi-structured (guided topic areas with flexibility) to unstructured (emergent, conversational). In-depth interviews are widely used in sociology, psychology, health sciences, anthropology, and organizational research to capture rich, detailed narratives and personal meaning.Reflexivity is the practice of examining how the researcher's identity, assumptions, relationships, and values influence the research process and findings. Rather than treating objectivity as achievable detachment, reflexivity acknowledges that the researcher is embedded within the research and cannot be fully separated from it. Originating in sociology and anthropology, reflexivity has become central to qualitative research rigor across disciplines. Reflexive researchers critically examine their own influence at each stage: research design, participant recruitment, data collection, interpretation, and presentation. This transparency strengthens rigor by making visible the lens through which data are collected and interpreted.
ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات
  1. v1
  2. 4 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED

انتقل إلى البحث تنزيل الشرائح

ScholarGateقارن الطرق: In-Depth Interview Method · Reflexivity in Qualitative Research. استُرجع بتاريخ 2026-06-17 من https://scholargate.app/ar/compare