ScholarGate
المساعد

قارن الطرق

راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.

نموذج التنبؤ بالعيوب×مقاييس تعقيد البرمجيات×
المجالهندسة البرمجياتهندسة البرمجيات
العائلةProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سنة النشأة20051976
صاحب الطريقةThomas Ostrand, Elaine Weyuker, Robert BellThomas J. McCabe
النوعmachine learning modelquantitative measurement
المصدر التأسيسيOstrand, T. J., Weyuker, E. J., & Bell, R. M. (2005). Predicting the location and number of faults in large software systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 31(4), 340–355. DOI ↗McCabe, T. J. (1976). A complexity measure. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2(4), 308–320. DOI ↗
الأسماء البديلةfault prediction, bug prediction, defect classificationcode complexity analysis, complexity measurement
ذات صلة44
الملخصDefect prediction models forecast the likelihood of software faults in code modules using statistical or machine learning approaches. Pioneered by Ostrand, Weyuker, and Bell (2005), these models correlate code metrics (complexity, churn, coupling) with historical defect data to identify high-risk components. Organizations use predictions to allocate testing resources, guide code review, and prioritize refactoring.Software complexity metrics quantify the structural and operational difficulty of code through numerical measurements. Introduced by Thomas McCabe in 1976, cyclomatic complexity became the foundational approach. These metrics assess maintainability, testability, and defect risk, enabling teams to identify problematic code regions and guide refactoring efforts.
ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات
  1. v1
  2. 3 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED

انتقل إلى البحث تنزيل الشرائح

ScholarGateقارن الطرق: Defect Prediction Model · Software Complexity Metrics. استُرجع بتاريخ 2026-06-15 من https://scholargate.app/ar/compare