跳到内容ScholarGate
文库我的文库桌面Review Studio助手
登录
Team Faultline Measurement/证据
方法证据记录

Team Faultline Measurement

Team faultline measurement quantifies the hypothetical dividing lines that can split a work group into relatively homogeneous subgroups based on the alignment of several member attributes at once. Dora Lau and Keith Murnighan introduced the faultline concept in 1998, arguing that what matters is not how diverse a group is on any single attribute but how strongly multiple attributes line up to create a clean cleavage — for example, when all the older members are also the men and the engineers, while all the younger members are the women and the marketers. Thatcher, Jehn, and Zanutto operationalized the idea in 2003 with the Fau index of faultline strength and a companion measure of faultline distance, and tested their effects on conflict and performance. Later work by Meyer and Glenz compared the proliferating measures and proposed an average-silhouette-width approach that can handle more than two subgroups. The method turns an intuition about subgroup splits into a reproducible number that can be entered into models of team process and outcomes.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

源记录

引文逐字复制自方法源记录。这些引文不代表任何层级的验证。

Team Faultline Measurement (Hypothetical Dividing Lines in Work Group Composition)
分类方法记录 · process-pipeline / organizational-behavior
  • Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 325-340. · DOI 10.5465/amr.1998.533229
  • Thatcher, S. M. B., Jehn, K. A., & Zanutto, E. (2003). Cracks in diversity research: The effects of diversity faultlines on conflict and performance. Group Decision and Negotiation, 12(3), 217-241. · DOI 10.1023/A:1023325406946
  • Meyer, B., & Glenz, A. (2013). Team faultline measures: A computational comparison and a new approach to multiple subgroups. Organizational Research Methods, 16(3), 393-424. · DOI 10.1177/1094428113484970
打开完整方法

精选声明

声明已持久化到证据分类账中,每个声明都有自己的评估。

尚无精选声明

当分类账中没有声明时,此视图不会自行创建声明评估。

相关方法

从方法图中生成,显示为机器建议的关系 — 不推断任何证据声明。

Same method familyMultitrait-Multimethod Matrixmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyOrganizational Network Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Used in the same domainPsychological Empowerment Scalemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

证据状态

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

来源

从方法源记录复制的 3 条记录的引文。

操作

打开方法页面
ScholarGate

以内容为本的研究方法参考文库——每种方法是什么、如何运作、源自何处。

开放数据(CC-BY)

探索

  • 文库
  • 搜索方法…
  • 按领域浏览
  • 学科领域
  • 历程
  • 对比
  • 该用哪种方法?

参考

  • 学科
  • 图集
  • 术语表
  • 方法论
  • 哲学

工作区

  • 我的文库
  • 桌面
  • 聊天

公司

  • 关于
  • 价格
  • 联系我们
  • 建议新方法

本词条系根据已发表文献整理,仅供参考。核实任何信息的准确性及其是否适用于您的具体用途,仍由您自行负责。

© 2026 ScholarGate · 研究方法参考文库
  • 隐私
  • Cookie
  • 条款
  • 删除账户