跳到内容ScholarGate
文库我的文库桌面Review Studio助手
登录
PROMIS Physical Function Item Bank/证据
方法证据记录

PROMIS Physical Function Item Bank

The PROMIS Physical Function item bank is a large, item-response-theory-calibrated collection of self-reported questions about physical functioning and mobility, developed under the United States National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System initiative. Rather than being a fixed questionnaire, it is a bank of items all placed on a single underlying continuum, so that any subset of items measures the same construct on the same metric. Rose and colleagues' 2008 evaluation of the preliminary bank demonstrated the expected advantages of this approach, and Cella and colleagues' 2010 report described the calibration of PROMIS's first wave of adult item banks. The items are calibrated with a graded response model and anchored to a T-score metric with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 in the United States general population. Because every item sits on the common metric, the bank supports both fixed short forms and computerized adaptive testing, letting researchers and clinicians measure physical function precisely with relatively few questions and compare scores across studies and instruments.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

源记录

引文逐字复制自方法源记录。这些引文不代表任何层级的验证。

PROMIS Physical Function Item Bank (IRT-Calibrated Self-Reported Function)
分类方法记录 · latent-structure / disability-studies
  • Rose, M., Bjorner, J. B., Becker, J., Fries, J. F., & Ware, J. E. (2008). Evaluation of a preliminary physical function item bank supported the expected advantages of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(1), 17-33. · DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.06.025
  • Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., et al. (2010). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179-1194. · DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011
打开完整方法

精选声明

声明已持久化到证据分类账中,每个声明都有自己的评估。

尚无精选声明

当分类账中没有声明时,此视图不会自行创建声明评估。

相关方法

从方法图中生成,显示为机器建议的关系 — 不推断任何证据声明。

Often confused withComputer-Adaptive Functioning Testingmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

证据状态

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

来源

从方法源记录复制的 2 条记录的引文。

操作

打开方法页面
ScholarGate

以内容为本的研究方法参考文库——每种方法是什么、如何运作、源自何处。

开放数据(CC-BY)

探索

  • 文库
  • 搜索方法…
  • 按领域浏览
  • 学科领域
  • 历程
  • 对比
  • 该用哪种方法?

参考

  • 学科
  • 图集
  • 术语表
  • 方法论
  • 哲学

工作区

  • 我的文库
  • 桌面
  • 聊天

公司

  • 关于
  • 价格
  • 联系我们
  • 建议新方法

本词条系根据已发表文献整理,仅供参考。核实任何信息的准确性及其是否适用于您的具体用途,仍由您自行负责。

© 2026 ScholarGate · 研究方法参考文库
  • 隐私
  • Cookie
  • 条款
  • 删除账户