跳到内容ScholarGate
文库我的文库桌面Review Studio助手
登录
Boston Aphasia Severity Rating Scale/证据
方法证据记录

Boston Aphasia Severity Rating Scale

The Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination Severity Rating Scale (BDAE-SRS) is the gold-standard clinician-administered assessment of aphasia severity and type in adults following stroke or acquired brain injury. Developed by Goodglass, Kaplan, and colleagues (2001, third edition), BDAE provides comprehensive evaluation of language across 18 domains (auditory comprehension, oral expression, naming, repetition, reading, writing) and yields both an overall severity rating (0–5 scale) and a detailed profile classifying aphasia syndrome (Broca's, Wernicke's, conduction, global, etc.). BDAE is foundational to aphasia diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment planning.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

源记录

引文逐字复制自方法源记录。这些引文不代表任何层级的验证。

Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination Severity Rating Scale (BDAE-SRS)
分类方法记录 · process-pipeline / speech-language-pathology
  • Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E., & Barresi, B. (2001). The Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination–Third Edition (BDAE-3). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. · ISBN 978-0-683-30562-9
  • Kertesz, A. (1982). Western Aphasia Battery. New York: Grune & Stratton. · URL
  • Scarpa, M. C., Colombo, M., Agosta, F., Volonté, M. A., & Filippi, M. (2009). Longitudinal Neuroimaging and Neuropsychological Changes in Primary Progressive Aphasia. Neurology, 72(8), 1705–1711. · URL
打开完整方法

精选声明

声明已持久化到证据分类账中,每个声明都有自己的评估。

尚无精选声明

当分类账中没有声明时,此视图不会自行创建声明评估。

相关方法

从方法图中生成,显示为机器建议的关系 — 不推断任何证据声明。

Same method familyAphasia Impact Questionnairemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyCommunication Confidence Rating Scale for Aphasiamachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyVoice Handicap Indexmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

证据状态

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

来源

从方法源记录复制的 3 条记录的引文。

操作

打开方法页面
ScholarGate

以内容为本的研究方法参考文库——每种方法是什么、如何运作、源自何处。

开放数据(CC-BY)

探索

  • 文库
  • 搜索方法…
  • 按领域浏览
  • 学科领域
  • 历程
  • 对比
  • 该用哪种方法?

参考

  • 学科
  • 图集
  • 术语表
  • 方法论
  • 哲学

工作区

  • 我的文库
  • 桌面
  • 聊天

公司

  • 关于
  • 价格
  • 联系我们
  • 建议新方法

本词条系根据已发表文献整理,仅供参考。核实任何信息的准确性及其是否适用于您的具体用途,仍由您自行负责。

© 2026 ScholarGate · 研究方法参考文库
  • 隐私
  • Cookie
  • 条款
  • 删除账户