跳到内容ScholarGate
文库我的文库桌面Review Studio助手
登录
Aphasia Impact Questionnaire/证据
方法证据记录

Aphasia Impact Questionnaire

The Aphasia Impact Questionnaire (AIQ), most commonly administered as the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale (SAQOL-39), is a comprehensive 39-item self-report measure of health-related quality of life in adults with aphasia following stroke or acquired brain injury. Developed by Hilari and colleagues (2003), AIQ assesses communication function, psychosocial well-being, physical health, and social participation—capturing the multidimensional burden of aphasia on daily life beyond linguistic deficits alone.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

源记录

引文逐字复制自方法源记录。这些引文不代表任何层级的验证。

Aphasia Impact Questionnaire (AIQ)
分类方法记录 · process-pipeline / speech-language-pathology
  • Hilari, K., Byng, S., Lamping, D. L., & Smith, S. C. (2003). Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale–39 (SAQOL-39): Evaluation of Acceptability, Reliability, and Validity. Stroke, 34(8), 1944–1950. · DOI 10.1161/01.str.0000081987.46660.ed
  • Hersh, D., Worrall, L., & Simmons-Mackie, N. (2012). How Do People With Aphasia View Quality of Life? Aphasiology, 26(2), 141–160. · URL
  • Cruice, M., Worrall, L., & Hickson, L. (2006). Quantifying Aphasic People's Health-Related Quality of Life. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 41(6), 713–730. · URL
打开完整方法

精选声明

声明已持久化到证据分类账中,每个声明都有自己的评估。

尚无精选声明

当分类账中没有声明时,此视图不会自行创建声明评估。

相关方法

从方法图中生成,显示为机器建议的关系 — 不推断任何证据声明。

Same method familyBoston Aphasia Severity Rating Scalemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyCommunication Confidence Rating Scale for Aphasiamachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyVoice Handicap Indexmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

证据状态

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

来源

从方法源记录复制的 3 条记录的引文。

操作

打开方法页面
ScholarGate

以内容为本的研究方法参考文库——每种方法是什么、如何运作、源自何处。

开放数据(CC-BY)

探索

  • 文库
  • 搜索方法…
  • 按领域浏览
  • 学科领域
  • 历程
  • 对比
  • 该用哪种方法?

参考

  • 学科
  • 图集
  • 术语表
  • 方法论
  • 哲学

工作区

  • 我的文库
  • 桌面
  • 聊天

公司

  • 关于
  • 价格
  • 联系我们
  • 建议新方法

本词条系根据已发表文献整理,仅供参考。核实任何信息的准确性及其是否适用于您的具体用途,仍由您自行负责。

© 2026 ScholarGate · 研究方法参考文库
  • 隐私
  • Cookie
  • 条款
  • 删除账户