So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| VRAG: Hướng dẫn Đánh giá Nguy cơ Bạo lực× | HCR-20v3: Quản lý Rủi ro Lâm sàng Lịch sử-20× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Tâm lý học pháp y | Tâm lý học pháp y |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1993 | 2013 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Grant T. Harris, Marnie E. Rice, Vernon L. Quinsey | Kevin S. Douglas, Stephen D. Hart, Christopher D. Webster, et al. |
| Loại≠ | Clinician-rated / File-based | Clinician-rated |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Quinsey, V. L. (1993). Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders: The development of a statistical prediction instrument. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology, 6(4), 269–279. DOI ↗ | Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., Belfrage, H., Guy, L. S., & Wilson, C. M. (2013). HCR-20v3: Assessing risk for violence. Simon Fraser University Mental Health Law Program. link ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác | VRAG, Harris-Rice-Quinsey VRAG | HCR-20v3, Historical Clinical Risk Management |
| Liên quan≠ | 4 | 5 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | The Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG) is an actuarial instrument developed by Harris, Rice, and Quinsey (1993) to estimate the probability of violent recidivism among adult male offenders released from forensic psychiatric hospitals. It represents one of the earliest empirically validated violence prediction tools and remains widely used in correctional, forensic psychiatric, and civil commitment settings. The VRAG combines static historical variables with dynamic factors to generate a probability-based risk assessment. | The HCR-20v3 is a structured professional judgment framework developed by Douglas, Hart, and colleagues for the assessment of risk for violence among adolescents and adults in mental health, criminal justice, and forensic settings. Published in 2013, it represents the third version of one of the most widely validated risk assessment instruments in forensic psychology, synthesizing clinical judgment with empirical evidence of violence risk factors. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|