ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Value Conflict Measurement×Post-Materialism Index×
Lĩnh vựcTâm lý học chính trịTâm lý học chính trị
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời19861971
Người khởi xướngPhilip Tetlock; Stanley Feldman & John ZallerRonald Inglehart
LoạiMeasurement of value conflict in political reasoningRanked-priorities value index
Công trình gốcTetlock, P. E. (1986). A Value Pluralism Model of Ideological Reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(4), 819-827. DOI ↗Inglehart, R. (1971). The silent revolution in Europe: Intergenerational change in post-industrial societies. American Political Science Review, 65(4), 991-1017. DOI ↗
Tên gọi khácValue Pluralism Measurement, Political Ambivalence Measurement, Value Trade-off Measurement, Conflicting Considerations MeasureInglehart Index, Materialist-Postmaterialist Index, Four-Item Values Index
Liên quan34
Tóm tắtValue conflict measurement quantifies the tension citizens feel when an issue pits two values they both cherish against each other, and traces its cognitive consequences. Philip Tetlock's value pluralism model holds that people reason in integratively complex ways precisely when an issue activates conflicting values they regard as important and roughly equal in weight. Stanley Feldman and John Zaller showed that this conflict, between values such as equality and economic individualism over the welfare state, produces ambivalence: opinions built from opposing considerations that are unstable and sensitive to how questions are framed. Together these approaches measure value conflict and link it to complexity, ambivalence, and the instability of political attitudes.The Post-Materialism Index, developed by Ronald Inglehart (1971), classifies individuals as materialist, postmaterialist, or mixed based on the priority they assign to physical and economic security versus self-expression, belonging, and quality of life. It operationalizes Inglehart's silent-revolution thesis that prosperity and security in postwar democracies caused an intergenerational shift from materialist to postmaterialist value priorities.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Value Conflict Measurement · Post-Materialism Index. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-25 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare