ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Uses and Gratifications Survey×Phân tích Thiết lập Chương trình Nghị sự×
Lĩnh vựcCommunicationNghiên cứu truyền thông
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời19731972
Người khởi xướngElihu Katz, Jay Blumler & Michael GurevitchMaxwell McCombs, Donald Shaw
LoạiAudience-centered survey approach to media motivations and rewardsEmpirical method for studying how media coverage affects issue salience and public concern
Công trình gốcKatz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509–523. DOI ↗McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176-187. DOI ↗
Tên gọi khácU&G survey, Gratifications sought and obtained survey, Media gratifications measurement, Kullanımlar ve Doyumlar Anketiagenda-setting theory, media agenda analysis, issue salience
Liên quan45
Tóm tắtThe uses and gratifications survey is the dominant audience-centered method in communication research, asking not what media do to people but what people do with media. Codified by Katz, Blumler, and Gurevitch in 1973, it treats audiences as active agents who select media to satisfy social and psychological needs, and it measures those motives and the rewards obtained through structured self-report scales.Agenda-Setting Analysis is an empirical method for investigating the influence of media coverage on what issues the public considers important. Developed by Maxwell McCombs and Donald Shaw (1972), the approach tests a core hypothesis about media effects: media coverage does not tell people what to think, but rather what to think about. By comparing the issues receiving media coverage with the issues the public identifies as important, researchers measure agenda-setting effects—the degree to which media attention predicts public concern. The method demonstrates media's power to structure the hierarchy of issues, even when media may not directly persuade on specific issues.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Uses and Gratifications Survey · Agenda-Setting Analysis. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-25 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare