So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Lấy mẫu trường hợp điển hình× | Chọn mẫu trường hợp lệch chuẩn× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Phương pháp luận khảo sát | Phương pháp luận khảo sát |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1980s (systematized in Patton 1990/2002) | 1990 |
| Người khởi xướng | Michael Quinn Patton | Michael Quinn Patton |
| Loại | Purposive qualitative sampling strategy | Purposive qualitative sampling strategy |
| Công trình gốc | Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761919711 | Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761919711 |
| Tên gọi khác | typical case selection, modal case sampling, representative case sampling, average case sampling | extreme case sampling, outlier sampling, negative case sampling, deviant-case selection |
| Liên quan | 5 | 5 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Typical case sampling is a purposive strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects cases that represent what is ordinary, normal, or most common within a target group. Rather than seeking outliers or the widest possible variation, the goal is to illustrate and communicate what a typical experience, program, or phenomenon looks like to stakeholders or audiences unfamiliar with it. The strategy is widely used in qualitative evaluation research and program reporting. | Deviant case sampling is a purposive qualitative sampling strategy in which the researcher intentionally selects cases that are unusual, exceptional, or markedly different from the norm — outliers, extreme successes, or conspicuous failures. The goal is not statistical representation but deep learning from cases that illuminate the boundaries of a phenomenon, challenge prevailing assumptions, or reveal processes that typical cases obscure. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|