So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Bộ sưu tập tài liệu tam giác hóa× | Thu thập tài liệu× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Phương pháp luận khảo sát | Phương pháp luận khảo sát |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1978 (triangulation); 2009 (document analysis as method) | 19th–20th century historical methods; contemporary social-science codification c. 2000s |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Norman K. Denzin (triangulation principle); Glenn Bowen (document analysis formalization) | Rooted in historical and social science traditions; systematized by Lindsay Prior and Glenn Bowen |
| Loại≠ | Qualitative/mixed-methods data collection strategy | Qualitative / mixed data-collection technique |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Denzin, N. K. (1978). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. link ↗ | Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác | documentary triangulation, multi-source document collection, cross-source document analysis, data triangulation via documents | document analysis, documentary method, document review, secondary document analysis |
| Liên quan≠ | 4 | 3 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Triangulated document collection is a qualitative data collection strategy in which documents from multiple independent sources are gathered and cross-checked against one another. By drawing on different document types — such as official records, personal archives, institutional reports, and media artifacts — the researcher reduces reliance on any single source and strengthens the credibility of the evidence base. The approach applies Denzin's data triangulation principle directly to documentary material. | Document collection is a systematic data-collection technique in which the researcher gathers and reviews existing written, visual, or digital records — such as reports, meeting minutes, policies, letters, photographs, or institutional records — as primary or supplementary evidence. It is widely used in qualitative, historical, and mixed-methods research and can stand alone or complement interviews and observation. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|