ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Phân tích trích dẫn theo lát cắt thời gian×Phân tích đồng trích dẫn (Co-Citation Analysis)×
Lĩnh vựcTrắc lượng khoa họcTrắc lượng thư mục
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời1955–1965 (foundational); temporal slicing formalized in scientometrics from the 1980s onward1973
Người khởi xướngEugene Garfield (citation analysis foundation); Derek J. de Solla Price (temporal/longitudinal framing)Henry Small
LoạiQuantitative scientometric techniqueMethod
Công trình gốcGarfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122(3159), 108–111. DOI ↗Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. DOI ↗
Tên gọi kháctemporal citation analysis, longitudinal citation analysis, time-window citation analysis, diachronic citation analysisco-citation mapping, historiograph, direct citation, citation pair analysis
Liên quan65
Tóm tắtTime-sliced citation analysis partitions a body of literature into sequential temporal windows — for example, five-year intervals — and performs citation analysis within and across each window. This reveals how citation patterns, influential papers, and knowledge flows shift over time, providing a dynamic picture of a field's intellectual evolution rather than a static aggregate snapshot.Co-citation analysis is a method that identifies the intellectual structure of a research domain by examining how frequently pairs of documents are cited together in other publications. When two papers are frequently cited together in the literature, they are considered co-cited, indicating they are conceptually related or influential within the same research community. Developed by Henry Small in 1973, co-citation analysis maps the 'invisible colleges' of science—networks of researchers working on related problems—and reveals how knowledge domains evolve over time.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Time-sliced Citation analysis · Co-Citation Analysis. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-19 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare