So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| System Justification Scale× | Thang đo Xu hướng Chính trị Cánh hữu (RWA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực≠ | Tâm lý học chính trị | Tâm lý học xã hội |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1994 | 1981 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | John T. Jost & Mahzarin R. Banaji | Bob Altemeyer |
| Loại≠ | Self-report attitude scale | Self-report Likert scale |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1-27. DOI ↗ | Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. University of Manitoba Press. link ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác≠ | SJS, General System Justification Scale, Economic System Justification Scale | RWA |
| Liên quan | 4 | 4 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | The System Justification Scale operationalizes system justification theory, introduced by Jost and Banaji (1994), which holds that people are motivated to defend, bolster, and rationalize the existing social, economic, and political status quo, even when doing so runs against their personal or group interest. The general version, refined by Kay and Jost (2003), is an 8-item self-report measure on which respondents rate agreement with statements such as 'In general, the American political system operates as it should' on a 7- or 9-point Likert scale. | The Right-Wing Authoritarianism Scale (RWA) is a self-report measure developed by Bob Altemeyer in 1981 to assess individual differences in authoritarian attitudes, including submission to established authorities, adherence to conventional norms, and aggression toward those perceived to violate social conventions. The scale measures three core dimensions: authoritarian submission, authoritarian aggression, and conventionalism. It has become a cornerstone of research on authoritarianism, political attitudes, and intergroup prejudice. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|