ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Tiêu chuẩn Báo cáo Thống kê: Báo cáo Minh bạch Phân tích×Cấu trúc IMRaD: Giới thiệu, Phương pháp, Kết quả và Thảo luận×
Lĩnh vựcViết học thuậtViết học thuật
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời20051970
Người khởi xướngStatistical and methodological literature; emphasized by Cumming (2013), ICMJE, and replication crisis discussionsInternational scientific publishing community (adopted widely by 1970s)
LoạiGuidelineGuideline
Công trình gốcCumming, G. (2013). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25(1), 7–29. DOI ↗International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2023). Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. link ↗
Tên gọi khácreporting statistics, statistical transparency, effect size reportingIMRaD, IMRAD, scientific manuscript structure
Liên quan45
Tóm tắtTransparent reporting of statistical results—including effect sizes, confidence intervals, p-values, and assumptions—is essential for scientific integrity and reproducibility. Many published studies report p-values in isolation without effect sizes or confidence intervals, making it impossible for readers to assess the magnitude of findings. Statistical reporting standards, emphasized by Cumming (2013), the American Statistical Association, and the ICMJE, require effect sizes, confidence intervals, and discussion of uncertainty. This enables readers to judge whether findings are practically significant (not just statistically significant) and to compare effect sizes across studies in meta-analyses. Poor statistical reporting wastes research and prevents proper synthesis of evidence.IMRaD is the standard organizational framework for scientific manuscripts in biomedical and natural sciences research. It separates reporting into four sequential sections—Introduction (why the research was conducted), Methods (how it was done), Results (what was found), and Discussion (what the findings mean)—enabling readers to understand, evaluate, and reproduce the work. Adopted as best practice by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) since the 1970s, IMRaD structure is now mandated or strongly recommended by most peer-reviewed journals.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 3 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Statistical Reporting Standards · IMRaD Structure. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-17 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare