ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Thí nghiệm tự nhiên mù đơn×Thử nghiệm đối chứng ngẫu nhiên mù đơn×
Lĩnh vựcThiết kế thí nghiệmThiết kế thí nghiệm
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đờiLate 20th century (formalized practice)1948 (formalized); single-blind variant established in mid-20th century clinical trial methodology
Người khởi xướngConceptual synthesis of natural experiment tradition (Haavelmo, 1944; Campbell & Stanley, 1963) with single-blind methodologyBradford Hill and colleagues (MRC streptomycin trial, 1948); blinding conventions codified in CONSORT guidelines
LoạiQuasi-experimental design with partial blindingExperimental design — blinded randomized trial
Công trình gốcDunning, T. (2012). Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences: A Design-Based Approach. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-1107698000Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., & CONSORT Group. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ, 340, c332. DOI ↗
Tên gọi khácsingle-masked natural experiment, blinded quasi-experiment, single-blind exogenous assignment studysingle-masked RCT, single-blind RCT, single-blind trial, SB-RCT
Liên quan25
Tóm tắtA single-blind natural experiment leverages an exogenous, researcher-uncontrolled event — such as a policy change, lottery, or natural disaster — to create treatment and comparison groups, while applying single-blind procedures so that either the participants or the outcome assessors (but not both) are unaware of group assignment. This design combines the causal leverage of natural variation with reduced measurement bias from blinding.A single-blind randomized controlled trial (SB-RCT) is a rigorous experimental design in which participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control conditions while remaining unaware of which condition they have received. Investigators, outcome assessors, and data analysts are not blinded. By masking participants, the design eliminates placebo and nocebo response biases on the participant side, while preserving investigator flexibility to administer and monitor the intervention.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Single-blind Natural Experiment · Single-blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-18 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare