ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Thí nghiệm thực địa mù đơn×Thí nghiệm thực địa phân cụm ngẫu nhiên×
Lĩnh vựcThiết kế thí nghiệmThiết kế thí nghiệm
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đờiMid-20th century (blinding conventions formalised 1940s–1960s)1980s–1990s (formalized methodology)
Người khởi xướngEstablished practice in experimental social science and clinical research; codified by Campbell & Stanley (1963) and Shadish, Cook & Campbell (2002)David M. Murray (group-randomized trials framework); applied broadly in public health and education research
LoạiControlled field experiment with partial blindingRandomized experimental design
Công trình gốcShadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Houghton Mifflin. ISBN: 978-0395615560Murray, D. M. (1998). Design and Analysis of Group-Randomized Trials. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195120424
Tên gọi khácsingle-masked field experiment, field experiment with single blinding, single-blind natural-setting trialCRFE, cluster-randomized trial in the field, group-randomized field experiment, community-randomized field experiment
Liên quan64
Tóm tắtA single-blind field experiment combines real-world experimental conditions with partial blinding: either participants or outcome assessors — but not both — are kept unaware of treatment assignment. This design reduces demand characteristics or observer bias while preserving ecological validity, making it a practical middle ground when full double-blinding is logistically infeasible in naturalistic settings.A cluster randomized field experiment (CRFE) assigns intact groups — schools, villages, clinics, workplaces — rather than individuals to treatment or control conditions, and the experiment is conducted in real-world settings rather than a laboratory. Randomization at the group level controls for contamination between conditions while preserving the ecological validity of the natural environment. It is the dominant design for evaluating community-level, school-based, or workplace interventions in public health, education policy, and development economics.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Single-blind field experiment · Cluster Randomized Field Experiment. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-18 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare