ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Thí nghiệm Yếu tố Mù Đơn×Thử nghiệm đối chứng ngẫu nhiên mù đơn×
Lĩnh vựcThiết kế thí nghiệmThiết kế thí nghiệm
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đờiFactorial design: 1926; single-blinding as systematic practice: mid-20th century1948 (formalized); single-blind variant established in mid-20th century clinical trial methodology
Người khởi xướngFisher, R. A. (factorial design); blinding practices formalized in clinical trials literature (20th century)Bradford Hill and colleagues (MRC streptomycin trial, 1948); blinding conventions codified in CONSORT guidelines
LoạiControlled experimental designExperimental design — blinded randomized trial
Công trình gốcMontgomery, D. C. (2017). Design and Analysis of Experiments (9th ed.). Wiley. ISBN: 978-1119113478Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., & CONSORT Group. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ, 340, c332. DOI ↗
Tên gọi khácsingle-masked factorial trial, single-blind factorial design, SB factorial experimentsingle-masked RCT, single-blind RCT, single-blind trial, SB-RCT
Liên quan55
Tóm tắtA single-blind factorial experiment combines factorial design — simultaneously varying two or more independent factors across all their level combinations — with single-blinding, in which participants are unaware of which treatment condition they have been assigned to while researchers and administrators remain unmasked. This design enables efficient estimation of main effects and interactions while reducing participant-side response bias.A single-blind randomized controlled trial (SB-RCT) is a rigorous experimental design in which participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control conditions while remaining unaware of which condition they have received. Investigators, outcome assessors, and data analysts are not blinded. By masking participants, the design eliminates placebo and nocebo response biases on the participant side, while preserving investigator flexibility to administer and monitor the intervention.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Single-blind Factorial Experiment · Single-blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-18 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare