So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Nghiên cứu so sánh nhân quả có hỗ trợ mô phỏng× | Ghép cặp điểm xu hướng× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực≠ | Thiết kế nghiên cứu | Thống kê nghiên cứu |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | Late 20th–early 21st century (hybrid approach formalized ~1990s–2000s) | 1983 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Synthesized from causal-comparative tradition (Donald T. Campbell; Julian Stanley) and simulation methodology | Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin |
| Loại≠ | Hybrid observational-simulation design | Method |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 978-1260087352 | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác≠ | simulation-augmented causal-comparative design, ex post facto simulation design, SA-CCR, causal-comparative with simulation validation | PSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance |
| Liên quan≠ | 4 | 3 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Simulation-assisted causal-comparative research is a hybrid observational design that combines the ex post facto logic of causal-comparative studies — comparing groups that differ on a naturally occurring variable — with computational simulation to strengthen causal inference, test counterfactuals, and assess the robustness of observed group differences. By augmenting real-world comparisons with simulated scenarios, researchers can explore causal mechanisms that cannot be manipulated experimentally. | Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|