So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Tính hợp lệ cấu trúc dạng rút gọn× | Giá trị phân biệt× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Trắc lượng tâm lý | Trắc lượng tâm lý |
| Họ | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1990s–2000s | 1959 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Multiple contributors; Smith, McCarthy, & Anderson (2000) formalized short-form validation criteria | Donald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske |
| Loại≠ | Validity assessment / scale shortening | Validity evidence / psychometric evaluation |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111. DOI ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác | abbreviated scale construct validity, short-form scale validation, brief scale validity, short measure construct validation | discriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity |
| Liên quan≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Short form construct validity is the systematic evaluation of whether an abbreviated version of a psychological scale still measures the same underlying construct as the original full-length instrument. It combines item selection procedures with confirmatory factor analysis, convergent and discriminant validity tests, and criterion-related evidence to demonstrate that scale shortening has not compromised the meaning of measurement. | Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|