So sánh phương pháp

	Thiết kế phương pháp hỗn hợp tuần tự theo chủ nghĩa thực dụng	Thiết kế phương pháp hỗn hợp giải thích tuần tự
Lĩnh vực	Thiết kế nghiên cứu	Thiết kế nghiên cứu
Họ	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Năm ra đời	2003–2010	2007 (formalized in Creswell & Plano Clark's mixed methods typology)
Người khởi xướng	Creswell & Plano Clark; Tashakkori & Teddlie (pragmatic worldview formalization)	John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark
Loại	Mixed methods research design	Mixed methods research design
Công trình gốc	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483344379	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379
Tên gọi khác	sequential pragmatic MMR, pragmatic sequential mixed design, sequential pragma-driven mixed methods, pragmatism-guided sequential mixed methods	explanatory sequential design, QUAN → qual design, two-phase explanatory design, sequential explanatory design
Liên quan	5	6
Tóm tắt	Sequential pragmatic mixed methods is a mixed-methods research design in which quantitative and qualitative data strands are collected and analyzed in a defined sequence — one strand following and building on the other — with the entire design anchored in a pragmatic philosophical worldview. Pragmatism foregrounds research usefulness and problem-solving, treating method choice as a practical decision rather than an ideological commitment, and it provides the integrative logic for combining the two strands into actionable insights.	The explanatory sequential mixed methods design is a two-phase research approach in which a quantitative study is conducted first, and qualitative data are then collected specifically to help explain or elaborate the initial quantitative results. The quantitative phase carries greater priority; the qualitative phase is purposefully built around the findings — such as surprising results, outliers, or statistically significant relationships — that need deeper interpretation.